|
CHINA. The Pope’s letter and the future of the Catholic Church
Praise of flexibility
|
«The election of the bishops of the Latin Church is up to the Holy See. But in the past it accepted agreements with Mussolini and Francisco Franco on this point. Why not proceed in an analogous way with the Chinese government?». Interview with Bishop Aloysius Jin Luxian, the “Patriarch” of Shanghai |
Interview with Aloysius Jin Luxian by Gianni Valente
Now, when consulted, he
raises his hands, declaring himself to be «a poor half-deaf old
man». A sly Jesuit’s trick, a wink at his interlocutor.
Everyone knows well that Aloysius Jin Luxian, Bishop of Shanghai, in spite
of his ailments, is gifted with a sharp mind. And his gaze is unchanged.
 |
 | | Bishop Aloysius Jin Luxian celebrating mass in the shrine of Sheshan, 1 May last | | |
 |
 |
May is the month of pilgrimages, to Our Lady of Sheshan
also, the shrine that rises on a hill in the countryside outside Shanghai.
How did it go this year?
ALOYSIUS JIN LUXIAN: Our Lady of Sheshan has been
the shrine of Shanghai since the 19th century, but already by the ’twenties of the last
century it had become a national shrine. So every year, beginning in the
second half of April, groups of pilgrims arrive from every part of China.
This past year more than seventy thousand people made the pilgrimage. The
first of May is the culminating moment. That day there are always more than
ten thousand pilgrims who come from all over the country. This year we
already began to greet the Madonna at the foot of the hill. All the way up
we prayed, sang, strewed flowers. I celebrated a solemn Eucharistic liturgy
when we arrived at the top. The Basilica can hold a little more than three
thousand faithful. The majority of those present heard mass from outside
the church. There were so many people that had it rained it wouldn’t
have wet the ground.
Two years ago you consecrated the young priest Joseph
Xing as auxiliary bishop who, according to the prevision, should become
your successor. How is Xing’s work proceeding?
JIN: Xing was nominated by Rome. Two years ago I
consecrated him auxiliary bishop. He works very well. His main
responsibility is the pastoral work of the diocese. We have 140 churches
and 150 thousand faithful. At first we hoped that the underground
communities would acknowledge him, because he was nominated by Rome. But
reality is not so simple. The underground bishop has already lost his
memory. The Vatican representative in Hong Kong has named a vicar general
for the underground community. Therefore they think here that Rome is not
really hoping to allow the underground communities to emerge from the
underground.
When will Xing take your place at the head of the
diocese?
JIN: He himself doesn’t want the succession to
take place immediately, because he is very young, the diocese of Shanghai
is large, the situation is very complicated. Moreover, according to Canon
Law, Xing is only auxiliary bishop and does not have the right of
succession. Therefore I too am waiting for Rome to nominate him coadjutor
bishop and for him to obtain the authorization of the government. As far as
I am concerned, I would like to hand over to him tomorrow. After all, I am
already 91 years old...
The nomination and the consecration of Xing seemed a
model for all of China: nominated by the Apostolic See, elected by the
representatives of the diocese, approved by the government. Then, in 2006,
there were new illegitimate ordinations.
JIN: I hope indeed that his consecration becomes a
model, so as to find a solution to the question of the ordination of
bishops. But the matter is not so simple. A foreign diplomat told me that
in order to do something in China you must in the first place have
patience, then you need to persevere, and you have to pay great attention
to tactics.
Meanwhile, in April, Michael Fu Tieshan, Bishop of
Beijing, died.
JIN: Bishop Fu Tieshan died after an illness that
lasted more than two years. But although he had the opportunity, he did not
prepare for his succession in time. And that is a great pity. I hope now
that the Holy See and the Chinese government develop good relations, so as
to avoid unnecessary problems.
 |
 |
 | | The shrine of Sheshan, on the outskirts of Shanghai, dedicated to Our Lady Help of Christians | | |
 |
But now all are awaiting the Pope’s letter to the
Chinese Catholics. What, personally, do you expect from this document?
JIN: The faithful of the whole Church in China are
waiting for the pastoral letter of the Pope, because it is such an
important thing. I have no doubts about the Pope’s knowledge of the
situation of the Chinese Church, his deep love for China and his trust. I
believe that the letter will be a milestone in the history of the Church in
China. And I hope that the “post-letter period” comes soon for
the Chinese Church.
The missionary Jeroom Heyndrickx has written that the
papal letter will have to answer a crucial question looming since the
’eighties: that is whether the priests and the faithful of the
“official” communities and those of the underground can
celebrate the Eucharist and the sacraments together.
JIN: I have read Father Heyndrickx’s article. He
understands China and loves the Church of China. I hope also that the
officials concerned study this article and find themselves in agreement
with its considerations.
Cardinal Zen hopes above all that in the letter there
will be clear rules to which all will have to submit to prevent
continuation of the equivocation of an “independent” Chinese
Church. Is it useful as you see to clarify the issue at this point?
JIN: I’ve also seen Cardinal Zen’s
statement, in which there was also news about the meeting organized in
January by the Holy See to deal with the issue of China. At the end of that
meeting they published a very short report, that was very good and that I
greatly appreciated. Apart from that, no other information has been
published. I would like to say a few things. First: apart from some single
exceptions, all the Chinese Catholics have a spirit of deep love and
perfect obedience to the Holy See; speaking for Shanghai, I’d hazard
that a hundred per cent of the faithful obey the Pope absolutely. Secondly:
in the Chinese Church there is no issue of independence and, I say it
again, the Chinese Catholics absolutely do not want the Catholic Church of
China to separate from the Pope, on the contrary they deeply despise the
people who plot for the separation of the Church in China. Thirdly: the
issue of episcopal ordination is not the only one that needs to be
clarified. I hope that other issues are resolved also. On my own behalf, I
want to say that the so-called “eight points” originating from
the Congregation for Evangelization of 1988 [that prohibited full
sacramental communion with the priests and bishops registered with the
Patriotic Association, ed] are no longer of use.
You too accepted being ordained without explicit
approval from Rome and were considered for long years an illegitimate
bishop. What difference is there between accepting illegitimate ordination
in China in the early ’eighties and accepting it today, in 2007?
JIN: I became auxiliary bishop in 1985, without having
obtained the nomination of the Pope. But the circumstances of 1985 and 2007
are completely different. At that time it was impossible to make contact
with Rome. Before my ordination I invited the priest Tang Han from Hong
Kong and Father Murphy of the United States so that they would be present
at the ceremony. They came and gave me great comfort. I knew that they
would come, and I thought that if the Vatican had not been in agreement,
that would have been impossible.
The international community has everywhere accepted
– even in Muslim or Communist countries – the fact that the
nomination of bishops is up to the Pope, and that that does not constitute
a danger to national sovereignty. What prevents this principle from also
being accepted in China?
JIN: The bishops serve to guarantee the apostolic
succession and the validity of the sacraments, and are not the political
leaders of a foreign power. I hope that the Chinese government also can
understand this circumstance and that a solution be reached through
dialogue. In the past the Holy See made treaties with the Italy of
Mussolini and the Spain of Francisco Franco to resolve problems of the
kind. Why should the solution of the same problems in an analogous way,
with the Chinese government also, be impossible? I’m of the opinion
that principles must be safeguarded, while there can be a certain
flexibility in their application. In relation to Christianity China suffers
the conditioning of past history. With the passage of time certain
misunderstandings can be overcome.
 |
 | | The recital of the Rosary in the “church of the south” (Nantang) dedicated to the Immaculate Conception, in Beijing | | |
 |
 |
According to some observers it is the leaders of the
Patriotic Association who are hindering the normalization of relations
between the government, the Chinese Church and the Holy See.
JIN: Goodness knows, perhaps some people in the
Patriotic Association do not want diplomatic relations between China and
the Vatican to be stabilized, because they could lose power. But I
personally think that the Patriotic Association cannot intervene in the
political decisions of China. It would be enough that some figure of high
political standing decided to re-establish relations with the Vatican, and
the Patriotic Association would no longer be able to put up obstacles.
In many situations in the past and in some cases still
today the Apostolic See allows civil governments to be directly involved in
the selection of bishops. Which model could be adapted to the Chinese
situation?
JIN: The election of bishops is up to the Holy See,
that principle must be affirmed. But since the political, historical and
economic context varies according to each country, the Holy See often forms
concrete agreements with the governments involved. I always hope that the
Chinese government and the Vatican will enter into an agreement that
includes the issue of the nomination of the bishops. Vietnam could be taken
as an example: the Vatican proposes two candidates and the government
chooses one of them. It is said that the Foreign Ministry, the Ministry of
the United Front of the Central Committee and the National Office for
Religious Affairs sent a delegation to visit the cardinal of Hô
Chí Minh Ville to get a better understanding with his help of the
issue of the nomination of bishops in Vietnam. I think that this also
indicates in some way the tendency of the future.
The problem is that among the Chinese Catholics, many,
looking at the history of the last fifty years, think that authentic faith
demands the refusal of any submission to civil power. How do you think of
that view?
JIN: The attitude of the majority of the Chinese
faithful is the following: in the first place, we obey the teaching of
Jesus, «Give to Cesar what is Cesar’s and to God what is
God’s». We also follow what the apostle Paul taught us in the Epistle to the Romans:
«Everyone should be subject to the lawful authorities; since there is
no authority if not from God and those that exist are established by
God». Saint Paul says also that «The governors are not to be
feared when good is done, but when evil is done». For him «it
is necessary to be subject, not only for fear of punishment, but also for
reasons of conscience», and to give «to everyone what is due to
him: to whom the tribute, the tribute; to whom taxes, taxes; to whom fear,
fear; to whom respect, respect». Here the government of the Communist
Party was established sixty years ago. Since then it has been the effective
government of China. And the current one is the best in the history of the
People’s China. Why should Catholics who represent less than one per
cent of the population oppose themselves to the Chinese government?
One knows that the Chinese leaders have difficulty in
grasping the true sacramental nature of the Church, which is always judged
to be a political entity. What do you think would be a good way to
overcome such misunderstandings and reservations?
JIN: The Chinese government is materialist, because it
takes Marxism as its parameter. It will be difficult to rid the Chinese
government of their vision of religion. The unexpected changes in Eastern
Europe have confirmed the opinions the Chinese government nourished about
the political role performed by the Catholic Church. I think that reality
will prove that the Vatican is not seeking some political objective, and
faced with the facts the Chinese government will be able to change its
attitude toward the Vatican.
The reconciliation between the two communities is
difficult because of the two psychological attitudes that mark them. The
underground adherents sometimes seem like the “laborers of the first
hour” worried that the latecomers will get the same wage as them.
Those who attend the open churches sometimes consider the underground
faithful as “prodigal sons” who must recognize that their
choice of a life of faith lived outside state control was mistaken. What
can help towards reconciliation?
JIN: Reconciliation and the return to unity between the
registered and non-registered communities faces great difficulties. Now the
attitude with which the official and the underground churches are awaiting
the pastoral letter of the Pope is not the same one. We are full of
confidence and await the pastoral letter of the Pope with relative
optimism, we guarantee that we will accept it with enthusiasm. The
underground cannot avoid having some worries, or the fear of being
repudiated, that is reflected in articles full of resentment written by
some priests of Taiwan. I think that such worries are superfluous. The
Church is a merciful mother. The Holy See will deal with us with the heart
of a merciful father. Both us and the underground must get rid of the worry
of being rejected.
 |
 |
 | | A girl entering the Beijing church of the Immaculate Conception to attend mass | | |
 |
In China there are young people who are becoming
Christian now and know nothing of the history of the Chinese Church. Given
the lasting divisions, sometimes the glorious past of martyrdom and of
witness risks also becoming a burden.
JIN: In China today there are many young people who
seriously face up to the great questions of human life. They have had
little contact with the virtues of the ancient morality. After the
liberation the traditional virtues were not guarded and valued. Now, in
consumer society, where economic power dominates, there are young people
who feel empty in their hearts. They would like to know Christ. Having
known Christ, some become attracted and become Christian. These people do
not know the history of Christianity in China. Time goes on, what is
important is to look to the future. I personally think that it’s not
necessary to speak to these young people about our troubled history. I hope
rather that with the Spirit of Christ they can live in the society of the
future and participate in its construction. And may it be so.
For long periods of your life you have been
misunderstood. They have called you the “red bishop”, or indeed
the “yellow Pope”... What worries you, and what comforts you
now, when you look at your experience and at the present condition of the
Chinese Church?
JIN: There are those who say that I am an enigma. Here
nearly all the old bishops have been in prison and became bishops after
their release. About them, in general, there have not been mutterings, they
are all well considered abroad also. What is now said about me within China
is generally positive: my speaking with frankness is appreciated, and it is
believed that I am politically transparent. But in foreign countries so
many slanders continue to be spread about me as to hide the heavens and the
earth. I don’t know how to explain it to myself, and in any case I
laugh about this, and I do not want to judge. What preoccupies me is the
present and the future of the Church in China. It is now faced with many
urgent matters. We must protect our priests, seminarians and nuns from the
pollution of the outside world so that they be true witnesses of Christ:
this is the most important thing, we must concentrate all our energy on
this point. Moreover, in politics and the economy China is advancing by
giant steps. I think that in less than twenty years the role China will
assume will be very important for the entire world. A billion three hundred
million Chinese aspire to create a harmonious society. I hope that the
Church can make its contribution to this process. In this circumstance I
would not indeed want a division, a disharmony in the Church to show. Just
at the moment in which all the Chinese are involved in realizing a great
economic and civil miracle, I hope that the ten million Catholics do not
assume an isolated position regarding this great multitude of people, I
hope that they do not sing out of tune, with the result of finding
themselves emarginated in the future. I pray you to implore God for
us. I hope that those who can will use their influence to guide our Church
in China to internal harmony, to the harmony of the whole Church in China
with the universal Church, so that here also we can be members in communion
with the same body.

|