|
CATECHISM
A treasury of words that grace makes re-emerge
|
Interview with Cardinal Christoph Schönborn on the Compendium of the Catechism of the Catholic Church |
by Gianni Valente
 |
 | | Cardinal Christoph Schönborn | | |
 |
 |
Time has passed since Father Christoph
spent the days in front of his old Macintosh, retyping and then retouching,
adjusting, amalgamating, paragraph after paragraph, the chapters of what would
become in 1992 the Universal Catechism of the Catholic Church. He was the “coordinator” of the
preparatory committee that for years, with the supervision of Cardinal Joseph
Ratzinger, then Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith,
worked on the drafting of the most substantial and authoritative exposition of
the contents of all of Catholic doctrine after Vatican Council II. Because of
this, in the role of “a person acquainted with the facts”, this Dominican of
gentle manners, become meanwhile Archbishop of Vienna and Cardinal, had an
active part also in the work of the new committee that from 2003 worked on the
editing of the Compendium of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, promulgated by Pope Benedict XVI on 28
June last, the vigil of the solemnities of Saints Peter and Paul, in the Sala
Clementina of the Apostolic Palace.
For you who worked for years on the
draft of the Catechism, the publication of your Compendium will appear as the point of arrival of
a long, tiring journey…
CHRISTOPH SCHÖNBORN: It’s the end of a
long work, which had its beginning at the special Synod of ’85, when the Synod
fathers asked the Pope
for the drafting of a Catechism that would collect the contents of the Catholic
faith. From ’87 I was called to be part of the preparatory committee under the
direction of Cardinal Ratzinger (who is today our Holy Father), who gave me the
occasion of being able to work at his side for a long time. Then, the
participants in the International Catechetics Congress asked that beginning
from that means a more manageable formulation of the same contents of faith
should be produced. And so the Compendium was developed which, as Benedict XVI explained, is «a
faithful and reliable synthesis of the Catechism of the Catholic Church» and «contains, in concise fashion, all
the essential and fundamental elements of the faith of the Church».
How do you judge this Compendium published at the end of June?
SCHÖNBORN: A clear exposition of the faith
is always a good thing and we always have need of it. As with all things done
by men it will not be of absolute perfection. But for certain it is a work of
the Church, and can be of comfort and help to the life of the faithful. And the
manner in which it was presented was in itself very suggestive.
What are you referring to?
SCHÖNBORN: That day, in the Sala Clementina,
I was comforted by the fact that there was not only the presentation of a book,
a secular celebration. The Compendium was consigned to the Church during a celebration of
Sext, the prayer of the daily Office. Presided over by the Pope. An occasion that
suggested in eloquent form that it is in the liturgy and in prayer that the
mysteries of the faith become present, can be contemplated and transmitted.
Catechesis and liturgy are inseparable. And then that day, by sheer
coincidence, the liturgy of the Church celebrated Saint Irenaeus.
A saint dear to you.
SCHÖNBORN: He too, in order to synthesize
his immense work against the heretics, wrote a sort of compendium, the Demonstratio
of the apostolic
preaching. Sending it to his friend Marcian, he presented it precisely as a
compendium, «a series of annotations on fundamental points, such that in few
pages much material can be found, having gathered together briefly the
fundamental lines of the body of truth». And also, on his feastday, itself, an
excerpt from Genesis
is read, to which Irenaeus gave a brilliant interpretation…
About what?
SCHÖNBORN: It’s the story about Lot and
his family who were granted escape from Sodom, before the city was destroyed,
through the Lord’s predeliction, on the condition that they did not look back.
But Lot’s wife regrettably looked behind her, and was transformed into a pillar
of salt. Because of female curiosity, the malevolent commentators say…
And Irenaeus?
SCHÖNBORN: The bishop martyr of Lyons on
the other hand sees in the episode a figure of the Church, which like Lot’s
wife is a mother who cannot find peace until she has seen that all her
children are saved. And because of this she delays, looks behind, to the point
of sacrificing her own life. Every gesture of the Church, also catechism, flows
from mercy like this. Which is the reflection in the Church of the mercy of the
Virgin Mary, for which one can say of both that they are causa nostrae
salutis…
And yet you yourself have spoken
frequently of a preconceived hostility toward the idea of catechism itself.
 |
 |
 | | The Compendium of the Catechism of the Catholic Church | | |
 |
SCHÖNBORN: It is one of my great
disappointments as a bishop to see how this testimony of apostolic faith
contained in the Catechism is not received in our dioceses. I confess that I prayed to Saint
Irenaeus himself because of this. It was he who bore witness first of all that
the Church had blossomed also in Germany, and that there also the brothers were
in agreement in the faith with the Church of Rome. This Church that never lost
the apostolic faith precisely because of the privilege of being founded on the
apostles.
Perhaps those who persist in presenting
the Compendium
also as an example of Catholic pride succeed in reinforcing such preconceived
hostilities…
SCHÖNBORN: But catechism has more to do
with the image of a child at the moment he learns to speak from his mother. He
learns the words, and the words are the names of the things that he discovers,
and it is all a surprise, a novelty. In this way children grasp the words that
help them throughout their lives. Étienne Gilson said that he found all that he
needed for his life of faith in his catechism. As a young priest something
happened to me that marked me…
Which is?
SCHÖNBORN: There was a married man who
lived in a dissolute way, he went with other women. Then his wife died
suddenly, and he was tormented by senses of guilt for having ignored her. He
came to mass every day, at seven in the morning. It impressed me that he, who
had for long years abandoned all practice of Christian life, recovered in his
memory the formula of the catechism. Those catechism phrases that he had
learned as a child came out like that, one after the other. In the shipwreck of
his life, these formula sprang from his memory like rafts to cling to, as the
only promises of salvation. And this showed me how much it can help also to
have in the memory just a treasury of words that perhaps he himself, as a
child, had learned without even understanding them, but which in that crucial
moment were there, at his disposal.
You quoted Gilson. Charles Péguy also
says that his faith was all there entire in the catechism of the diocese of
Orléans, «the catechism of the birth parish, that of the small children».
SCHÖNBORN: The catechism can never become
a pretext for presumption and pride, because rather it suggests that in
Christian life we are always beginners, children. In respect of the catechism,
the child and the professor always remain at the same level, because before the
mysteries of faith we are always children. The child that Saint Augustine met
on the beach of Civitavecchia, and who makes him understand that with all his
theological application he could never exhaust the profundity of the mystery of
the Most Holy Trinity, is for me the icon of the catechism.
The attention of the media concentrated
rather on moral questions and those of public ethics. As if it had to do with a
manual of instructions and moral prohibitions. In this regard Cardinal Honoré,
a member of the preparatory committee, once wrote that it was necessary to correct
a formulation that in the initial drafts could appear to have been Pelagian…
SCHÖNBORN: The Compendium, obviously, reproduces the Catechism in this also. In number 417, for example,
it is clarified that «because of sin, natural law is not always and not by all
perceived with equal clarity and immediacy». And in paragraph 419 it is added
that the Old Law, even though holy, spiritual and good, «does not of itself
bestow the strength and the grace of the Spirit to observe it». Original sin
often finishes by also obscuring in individuals the right perception of when
the precepts of the natural law are broken. As the then Cardinal Ratzinger said
during the Jubilee year, when he presented the document on the faults of the
Church: «It seems to me that pardon alone, the fact of pardon, permits the
frankness of recognizing sin».
According to you, from where do the
reservations still circulating among those who are also involved in these
things by profession, toward the instrument of the catechism arise?
SCHÖNBORN: On the one hand, already from
the ’Fifties the Biblical movement also began to influence the practice of
catechesis, with the invitation – in itself shareable – to recover
in catechesis too the references to the richness of the Biblical story,
overcoming the sometimes dry and abstract character of some formula used up
until then. But on the other hand, there was also the prejudice that the truth
could not be put into phrases, into sentences that define it. And this is an
error, because there is never the pretension that the doctrinal formula can
contain and exhaust the reality that it indicates. Léon Bloy already emphasized
the strength and at the same time the insufficiency of dogmatic formula. And
Saint Thomas made it clear that «Fides non terminatur ad enuntiabile, sed ad
rem». And then it is also necessary to recognize that sometimes the words of
Jesus themselves have a so to speak didactic trait. Jesus, true master, has
also the wisdom of the educator. Many of his expressions are sentences made to
be memorized.
 |
«There was a married man who lived in a dissolute way, he went with other women. Then his wife died suddenly, and he was tormented by senses of guilt for having ignored her. He came to mass every day, at seven in the morning. It impressed me that he, who had for long years abandoned all practice of Christian life, recovered in his memory the formula of the catechism. Those catechism phrases that he had learned as a child came out like that, one after the other. In the shipwreck of his life, these formula sprang from his memory like rafts to cling to, as the only promises of salvation. And this showed me how much it can also help to have in the memory just a treasury of words that perhaps he himself, as a child, had learned without even understanding them, but which in that crucial moment were there, at his disposal» |
 |
 |
With regard to didactics, some held
that the question and answer method presented again in the new Compendium had been surpassed.
SCHÖNBORN: Once, in an airport bookshop,
between a book on the Dalai Lama and another on the esoteric, I found a type of
Hindu catechism, in questions and answers. It was entitled Daddy, am I a
Hindu? It was presented
as if the son asked the questions and the father replied…
And what do you mean to convey by this?
SCHÖNBORN: The question and answer method
has nothing original in itself, it can also carry all the cultural and
religious expressions of humanity. But this obviousness of method does not in
fact surprise me. The newness of Christianity communicates itself through the
ordinary processes of life, by the normal mechanism through which news is
communicated, which is that of the questions that children ask of adults and
the answers they receive. Daddy, is it true that God can do everything? Why is
there evil? Who is Jesus? It is the normal way that the processes of human
learning develop in respect of all reality. And the fact of adopting again the
natural expressive dynamics to communicate the treasures of grace is truly
Christian.
Does this mean that the truths of the
Christian faith are communicated as those of any other doctrine?
SCHÖNBORN: The original factor is not in
the formula used, but in Him who Saint Augustine calls the «interior master»,
who is Christ Himself, the Son of God. Every time in the life of faith, at the
beginning and with every new step there is, that fascinating moment through
which we gather the mysterious correspondence between a reality, between a
truth of faith and our heart – and you see it also in the eyes, that
light up -, well, this is the work of Christ.
It is precisely Augustine, in De
praedestinatione sanctorum, who recognizes that for the initium fidei it is not enough that the truth be
announced. Because - he says – if faith was a mere agreeing with an
announced truth, it would properly be a work of our own…
SCHÖNBORN: This is the most important
thing for the catechist, and also for the preacher, who always knows that he
must explain the truth with the greatest clarity possible, but that it is not
he who completes the work of its reception. In the Acts of the Apostles it is always the Holy Spirit who opens the
door to the word. If He does not open, the preached truth cannot enter.

|